The following table summarizes the principal independent attestations of A. in iconographic and oral traditions known to the present author. Sources are listed by cultural origin, date of earliest attestation, the local name (transliterated), and the principal iconographic feature.
| # | Culture / Region | Date | Local Name | Iconographic Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sumer (Nineveh) | c. 2400 BCE | π π ππ π | Open ovoid; flanking dots |
| 2 | Old Kingdom Egypt | c. 2200 BCE | πΏ (?) | Hieroglyph: open mouth; not in the Gardiner list |
| 3 | Mohenjo-daro | c. 2000 BCE | (seal 4047) | Concentric rings, broken at six o'clock |
| 4 | Minoan Crete | c. 1700 BCE | Ποικιλον | Open form on Linear A tablets HT 31–32 |
| 5 | Olmec (La Venta) | c. 1200 BCE | (uncatalogued) | Centrally-pierced stelae |
| 6 | Late Bronze Levant | c. 1100 BCE | Χ€'Χ ΧͺΧΧΧ | “Mouth of the deep” (literally) |
| 7 | Etruscan | c. 700 BCE | aritimi | Bronze mirror reverses, central rosette |
| 8 | Han dynasty China | c. 200 BCE | η‘εΊδΉη©΄ | “the bottomless hole” in Huainanzi |
| 9 | Roman Egypt | c. 100 CE | os patens | Coptic amulets; bull’s-eye motif |
| 10 | Late Anglo-Saxon | c. 950 CE | gæpe | Carved roof bosses, Durham & York |
| 11 | Mali (Dogon) | c. 1100 CE | nommo köpo | Granary-door carvings, southern terraces |
| 12 | Inuit (Baffin Island) | c. 1300 CE | kanaaq | Scrimshaw on walrus tusk |
| 13 | Aztec | c. 1400 CE | tlal–camac | Codex Borgia, fol. 33v |
| 14 | Renaissance Italy | c. 1487 CE | vas patens | Marginalia, Konstanz manuscript (cf. Council of Konstanz) |
| 15 | Edo Japan | c. 1700 CE | 口 | Ukiyo-e (single attribution, Hokusai) |
| 16 | Appalachia (USA) | c. 1850 CE | “the look” | Quilt pattern, single farmstead, central PA |
| 17 | Linglestown, PA | 1996 CE | (unnamed) | Reported communal experience; no iconography produced |
Note. The Linglestown attestation (entry 17) is the only one in the table to lack an associated iconographic artifact. This is sometimes treated as evidence of a culture too close to A. to render it pictorially — an argument the present author finds plausible and, accordingly, declines to make.